The Constitution assigns a number of supervisory functions to the Storting, including
- to examine the Records of the Council of State (the decisions taken in Council)
- to review treaties concluded with foreign powers
- to audit the State Accounts
However, perhaps the most important duty is not set out in the Constitution at all. This is the political accountability of the Government towards the Storting.
The substantial supervision which the Storting exercises over the public administration is based on different sources of information. It may be reports from one of the Storting’s independent supervisory bodies, such as the Auditor General or the Parliamentary Ombudsman, or it may be matters communicated through the mass media which may be looked into by the Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs.
The Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs, and other Standing Committees
The Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs, which is one of the Storting's 12 standing committees, reviews and makes recommendations to the Storting on matters concerning supervision of the Government and the public administration. Reports from the Office of the Auditor General (see below) constitute the bulk of the workload, of which reports on performance audit are most frequent. The Committee also examines reports from the Government, such as the Records of the Council of State.
Furthermore, the Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs is distinguished from the other standing committees by the fact that it can act on its own initiative when dealing with supervisory matters. The Committee is entitled to perform any inquiry into the public administration it finds necessary for the exercise of the Storting's supervisory power. Such inquiries may only be made after the relevant minister has been notified and requested to submit the required information. As a rule, the other standing committees in the Storting may only deal with matters of business referred to them by the Storting. Other committees may also on occasion deal with supervisory matters that are referred to them by the Storting. For example, the Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defence reviews the annual report on treaties and agreements concluded with foreign powers.
The Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs also deals with matters concerning constitutional responsibility. The Committee is empowered to initiate inquiries that may lead to an impeachment process against a Member of the Storting or the Government, or a Supreme Court judge.
In addition to supervisory issues, the committee also deals with constitutional matters, appropriations to the Storting and the Royal Household, and election legislation.
Questions and Interpellations
Questions and interpellations addressed to the members of the Government provide an opportunity for the elected Members of the Storting to obtain information on specific matters and to ascertain the views of the ministers on specific political issues. Although government ministers are entitled to refuse to answer questions, as a rule all questions are answered. In fact, the government ministries make a great effort to enable ministers to do this.
Question Time is generally held in the Storting every Wednesday morning at ten o’clock; first Oral Question Time and then Ordinary Question Time.
During Oral Question Time, members of the Government answer brief questions put to them orally by Members of the Storting. On Monday of the same week, the Prime Minister will have informed the President of the Storting which members of the Government will take part, and the President will then have notified the Members of this. Normally, three members of Government take part every week. The exception is when the Prime Minister appears, which is approximately once a month. The President decides which Members are to ask questions, and in which order. A Member may not ask more than one main question. After the answer, the questioner is entitled to speak once more. The President may call upon other Members to speak once concerning the matter addressed in the question. A member of the Government is entitled to speak after each such speech. Usually Oral Question Time lasts for a little more than one hour. It is popular with the Members of the Storting, and the opposition uses it freely.
During Ordinary Question Time, members of the Government answer questions that have been submitted in writing by the Members. Around twenty questions are normally answered this way every week. Any Member who wishes to question a government minister and receive an answer during Question Time must file his or her written question by Friday morning of the previous week. A Member is limited to two questions at any Question Time. Questions must be brief, and generally refer to specific issues. They often deal with matters of local concern that the media have focused attention on. The Minister is asked for the Government’s view on the matter and what action the Ministry intends to take, if any. After a question has been stated and the answer given, the questioner and the Minister are each allowed to take the floor twice for brief remarks. A general debate is not permitted, and the Storting may not pass resolutions.
Questions to be answered in writing
A Member who wishes to have a written answer to a question put to a member of the Government submits the question in writing to the President of the Storting, through the Storting’s administration, with an endorsement stating that a written answer is requested. Questions should be brief and must be signed personally by the questioner. The President should reject questions concerning matters that are outside the sphere of responsibility of the Government. In the course of any one calendar week, a Member may not submit more than two questions to be answered in writing and questions in an ordinary Question Time. Questions to be answered in writing may not be submitted in the period from 1st July - 14th August.
A member of the Government must submit a written answer to the question within six working days after the question was sent from the Storting. In the event of a delay, the member of Government must state the reason for this, and when the question will be answered. As a general rule, the answer should not exceed two A-4 pages in length. The Storting’s administration ensures that the questions and answers are published on the Storting’s website. They are also printed in the official report on Storting proceedings.
Questions to be answered in writing are increasingly popular with the Members. The number of questions has gone up substantially over the last few years. During the 2007-2008 session, there were ca. 1600 questions, and it looks as though the number will continue to grow.
Interpellations are a more elaborate way of presenting questions. An interpellation must be brief and filed in writing. Compared with questions for Question Time, interpellations generally deal with matters of greater scope and political importance, and generally lead to debates. The President may reject interpellations if the same matter is currently being or has been dealt with by a standing committee and has yet to be deliberated by the Storting. The President may also reject interpellations concerning matters on which interpellations or questions have already been submitted but not yet answered. The same applies to matters that fall outside the sphere of responsibility of the Government. The two last reasons for rejection mentioned also apply to Questions.
An interpellation should be answered in the Storting at the earliest possible opportunity, preferably within one month after it was submitted. When a matter is dealt with in the Storting, the interpellator is called upon to speak first - for no longer than 10 minutes - to explain the substance of the interpellation. The same time limit applies to the member of the Government who answers the interpellation. The Prime Minister and other ministers whose ministries are affected by the interpellation may also answer.
In the ensuing debate, both the interpellator and the member of the Government are first entitled to make one brief speech. Following that, other Members may speak briefly once each. Finally, the interpellator and the member of the Government are each entitled to make short remarks. Consideration of the interpellation must not last longer than one hour and 30 minutes, and proposals may not be submitted.
The Office of The Auditor General
The Constitution provides that the Storting should appoint five national auditors who annually examine the State Accounts. The Office of the Auditor General is the Storting's most important supervisory body, examining the activities of the national administration to ensure that State assets are utilized and managed according to sound financial principles and in keeping with the decisions and intentions of the Storting.
The Office of the Auditor General is independent of the Government and other administrative bodies. It currently has around 500 employees organized in 6 departments and an administration section, with a total of 17 offices scattered around the country. The five national auditors appointed by the Storting jointly head the Office of the Auditor General. The Storting makes the final decision on approval of the State Accounts after the Office of the Auditor General has submitted its annotations and proposals.
Read more about the Office of the Auditor General:
The Parliamentary Ombudsman
The Parliamentary Ombudsman is appointed by the Storting for a term of four years, beginning 1 January the year after a general election. This official may not be a Member of the Storting, and he or she must be a lawyer as well as possessing the qualifications required of a Supreme Court judge.
The duty of the Ombudsman is to ensure that individuals do not suffer injustice at the hands of the public administration (national, county or municipal). A court action is costly and time-consuming, so by taking a complaint to the Ombudsman, an aggrieved person may obtain a decision through a much easier process. The Ombudsman examines the case and makes a statement. If it is found that a government action or decision is in violation of the law or is manifestly unreasonable, the agency or official in question will normally reconsider the matter and follow the recommendations of the Ombudsman.
If the Ombudsman finds reason to do so, he or she may initiate a thorough investigation of administrative proceedings, decisions or other matters.
The Ombudsman Act of 1962 provides that the Ombudsman must send an annual report to the Storting on his activities, giving, among other things, an account of the proceedings in cases of general interest. If the Ombudsman becomes aware of negligence or errors of major significance or scope, he or she may submit a special report to the Storting and to the appropriate administrative agency.
Read more about the Parliamentary Ombudsman:
The Parliamentary Ombudsman for the Armed Forces
The Parliamentary Ombudsman for the Armed Forces and the Ombudsman’s Committee, consisting of seven members, are elected by, and report to the Storting. The duty of the Ombudsman is to safeguard the rights of all members of the Armed Forces. Anyone who feels that he or she has been wrongly treated may ask for the matter to be investigated by the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman will determine whether injustice has been done, and if so, will ensure that corrective action is taken.
The Ombudsman’s Committee submits annual reports to the Storting. In addition, the Ombudsman may initiate action, and may at any time report to the Storting. The Ombudsman acts as an adviser to the Storting and the Ministry of Defence on matters within its sphere of competence and carries out inspections of Norwegian military units home and abroad.
The Parliamentary Ombudsman for the Civilian National Service
The Parliamentary Ombudsman for the Civilian National Service carries out the same tasks and has the same authority towards members of the Civilian National Service as the Parliamentary Ombudsman for the Armed Forces has towards those of the Armed Forces. For practical purposes, the same individuals are elected as Ombudsmen and as members of the Ombudsman’s Committee for both the Armed Forces and the Civilian National Service.
The Norwegian Parliamentary Intelligence Oversight Committee (EOS Committee)
The Norwegian Parliamentary Intelligence Oversight Committee (EOS Committee) is a permanent committee consisting of seven members who monitor the Police Security Service, the Defence Security Service and Military Intelligence. The members of the Committee are elected by the Storting for a period of 5 years.
The Committee is responsible for continuous supervision of the work of the above-mentioned services, and investigates complaints. It also initiates its own issues where appropriate. The main aim of this Committee is to protect the security of the individual citizen. The Committee reports annually to the Storting.
Norwegian National Human Rights Institution
The primary function of the Norwegian National Human Rights Institution is to promote and protect human rights in accordance with the Constitution, the Human Rights Act and other legislation, international treaties and other international law. The national institution shall contribute to strengthening the implementation of human rights, in particular by:
a) monitoring and reporting on the human rights situation in Norway, including making recommendations to ensure that Norway's human rights obligations are fulfilled,
b) advising the Storting, the Government, the Sami parliament and other public bodies and private parties on the implementation of human rights,
c) disseminating information about human rights, including providing guidance to individuals about national and international complaints mechanisms,
d) promoting the teaching, education and research in human rights,
e) facilitating cooperation with relevant public bodies and other parties engaged in human rights work,
f) participating in international cooperation to promote and protect human rights.
The national institution shall not hear individual cases concerning violations of human rights.
The national institution shall submit an annual report to the Storting on the institution's activities and on developments in the human rights situation in Norway.
Read more about the Norwegian National Human Rights Institution: